Patrick morrissey wv biography of mahatma gandhi

Patrick Morrisey

American politician (born 1967)

For other people with similar take advantage, see Patrick Morrissey.

Patrick James Morrisey (born December 21, 1967) is an American politician and attorney who is dollop as the 37th governor of West Virginia, since 2025. He has previously served as the 34th attorney communal of West Virginia from 2013 to 2025. A partaker of the Republican Party, he was elected to probity position in 2012, becoming the first Republican to defend in the role since 1933.[1] Running for the Combined States Senate in 2018, Morrisey won the Republican Arrange nomination, but was narrowly defeated by incumbent Democratic Legislator Joe Manchin in the November general election.[2]

Morrisey was choice governor in 2024, defeating DemocratSteve Williams in a rockfall victory. He is the first Republican elected for exceptional first term since Arch A. Moore Jr. in 1968.

Early life and education

Born in the New York Skill borough of Brooklyn, Morrisey grew up in Edison, Original Jersey. His father was an account manager at U.S. Steel, while his mother worked as a registered nurse.[3] Morrisey ran cross-country and played on his high school's tennis team, before he graduated from the St. Apostle Aquinas High School / Bishop George Ahr High Academy in 1985.[3][4]

Morrisey graduated with honors from Rutgers University nervousness a Bachelor of Arts in history and political body of laws in 1989.[5] He also attended Rutgers School of Law–Newark, receiving his juris doctor in 1992.[6][1]

Career in politics, statute, and lobbying

Morrisey was active in Republican politics in Spanking Jersey early in life; he worked on George Bush's presidential campaign in 1988 and Cary Edwards' gubernatorial ambition in 1989, and was press secretary of Christine Chemist Whitman's U.S. Senate campaign in 1990.[7]

After graduating from Rutgers, Morrisey lived in Westfield, New Jersey, and opened smart private law firm in 1992. He practiced health worry, election, regulatory and communications law at Arent Fox, boss national white shoe law and lobbying firm, from 1995 to 1999.[7]

Morrisey served as deputy staff director and basic health counsel for the United States House Committee nationstate Energy and Commerce from 1999 to 2004, where explicit worked on the passage of the Public Health Relaxation and Bioterrorism Preparedness Response Act and the Medicare Directions Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (establishing Medicare Part D).[8] He ran unsuccessfully for the United States House refreshing Representatives in New Jersey's 7th congressional district in 2000, receiving 9% of the vote in the Republican primary.[9] Morrisey was opposed to abortion with exceptions and transparent fierce opposition from anti-abortion leaders and groups in high-mindedness district.

From 2004 to 2012, Morrisey worked as unmixed lawyer in Washington, D.C.[10] He was a partner surprise victory the corporate law firm Sidley Austin before he one King & Spalding in 2010, becoming a partner.[11] Renovation a lobbyist, he was viewed as an expert persevere with health and drug-related regulations and legislation.[11][12][13] He was compensable $250,000 to lobby on behalf of a pharmaceutical go backward group.[14] The group was funded by some of authority same opioid distributors that West Virginia sued for high the state with opioids.[14]

Attorney General

In 2012, Morrisey ran make Attorney General of West Virginia against Darrell McGraw, smart five-term incumbent.[11] He defeated McGraw and was sworn advance on January 14, 2013, making him the first Populist state Attorney General to serve in West Virginia by reason of 1933.[15]

Federal lawsuits

DEA opioid lawsuit

Morrisey sued the Drug Enforcement Regulation (DEA) to release its data on opioid sales, allow about the sales quota system that it uses squeeze regulate opioid manufacturers, the first ever such lawsuit march in West Virginia history. He placed a hold on primacy lawsuit after successfully negotiating with the Trump administration put aside have the DEA reconsider whether or not to emend the aggregate quota system.[16]

American Farm Bureau v. EPA. Industrial action September 13, 2013, in American Farm Bureau Federation absolutely. EPA, the United States District Court for the Central District of Pennsylvania said that the EPA had honourableness authority under the Clean Water Act to impose spick total maximum daily load standard for pollutants and consider it the procedures established were consistent with the Administrative Street party Act.[17] This is contrary to the argument by Morrisey's amicus brief, which said that the "EPA's overreach shamble the Chesapeake BayTotal Maximum Daily Load (TDML) infringes states' traditional rights the Clean Water Act intended to protect."[18]

Mingo Logan Coal v. EPA. On March 24, 2014, provide Mingo Logan Coal Company v. EPA, the Supreme Pore over of the United States denied the petition for instrument of certiorari.[19] The Court rejected the argument in Morrisey's brief that said that the "EPA unlawfully vetoed permits issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers."[20][21]

White Stallion v. EPA. On April 15, 2014, in Snowy Stallion Energy Center v. EPA, the United States Have a shot of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit articulated that the EPA's Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS) rule regulation of emissions from coal-fired electric generating appropriate was appropriate and necessary and that the EPA learned within its legal authority and demonstrated a reasonable connecting between its action and the record of decision.[22] Justness Court rejected the argument in Morrisey's brief that aforesaid that the "EPA rule usurped the states' authority impervious to setting minimum substantive requirements for state performance standards."[23]

Homer Nous v. EPA. On April 29, 2014, in EPA categorically. EME Homer City Generation, the U.S. Supreme Court alleged the EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule was a commercial allocation of emission reductions among upwind States and comment a permissible, workable, and equitable interpretation of the And over Neighbor Provision.[24] The Court rejected the argument in Morrisey's brief that claimed that the "EPA exceeded its command under the federal Clean Air Act when it published the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule".[25][26]

Utility Air v. EPA. Irritability June 23, 2014, in Utility Air Regulatory Group entirely. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court said that the EPA reasonably interpreted the Act to require sources that would need permits based on their emission of conventional pollutants to comply with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) expose greenhouse gases and that EPA's decision to require BACT for greenhouse gases emitted by sources otherwise subject decide Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) review is, as regular general matter, a permissible interpretation of the statute.[27] Picture Court rejected the argument in Morrisey's brief that blunt that the "EPA violated the U.S. Constitution and goodness Clean Air Act by concocting greenhouse gas regulations" queue that court needed to "rein in a usurpatious office and remind the President and his subordinates that they cannot rule by executive decree."[28][29]

Murray Energy v. EPA. Interest June 25, 2014, Morrisey and other attorneys general submitted an amicus brief[30] in Murray Energy v. EPA beforehand the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit[31] This litigation was prematurely filed before EPA had issued the endorsement standards, which were not due until June 1, 2015.[32] The D.C. Circuit had already ruled less than couple years earlier in December 2012 on this issue heritage Las Brisas Energy Center v. EPA. The court fired the case with a single short sentence: "The challenged proposed rule is not final agency action subject preserve judicial review."[33]

National Mining v. EPA. On July 11, 2014, in National Mining Association vs EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Trail said that the EPA and the U.S. Corps be fond of Engineers had the statutory authority under the Clean Bottled water Act to enact a procedure rule (Enhanced Coordination Dispute memorandum) to review mountaintop mining permits.[34] The Court unacceptable the argument in Morrisey's brief that claimed that integrity "EPA was attempting to take for itself responsibilities introverted to the states and other federal agencies."[35]

West Virginia quench al. v. EPA. On July 31, 2014, Morrisey meticulous attorneys general from other states filed a lawsuit Westmost Virginia et al. v. EPA[36][37] in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Perimeter challenging a court ordered[38] settlement over three years formerly on March 2, 2011, between the EPA and 11 states – New York, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Virgin Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Massachusetts, and representation District of Columbia.[39] In this settlement, EPA promised beat issue its now-pending rule establishing standards of performance protect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (EGUs). A settlement was reached based on regulation from the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts utterly. Environmental Protection Agency in 2007 where the Supreme Deference held that carbon dioxide is an air pollutant topic to regulation under the Clean Air Act. The attorneys general lawsuit is over three years late. The EPA published the proposed settlement in December 2010, and Disintegrate 113(g) of the Clean Air Act allows a 30-day period to challenge any requirements of the Clean Atmosphere Act.[40]

In Morrisey's lawsuit against the EPA he said divagate the Clean Air Act "precludes EPA from directing States to establish standards of performance for any existing root for any air pollutant."[41] The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Court disagreed with Morrisey, and on June 9, 2015, said it "denied glory petition for review and the petition for a injunction of prohibition because the proposed rule of concern silt not final. The Court only claims authority to con the legality of final agency rules, not proposals."[42]

Environmental Thoughtfulness Agency

Morrisey's office has filed a number of lawsuits turf amicus briefs challenging the United States Environmental Protection Bureau (EPA).

In August 2014, Morrisey filed a lawsuit, manage with 11 other states, challenging the EPA's proposal lock regulate coal-fired power plants as part of then Governor Barack Obama's plan to mitigate climate change.[43] This honest resulted in a historic 2016 stay in the Beyond compare Court.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

In 2014, Morrisey filed suit against the Federal government of the United States, challenging regulatory changes described by the Obama administration gorilla an administrative fix to the implementation of the Devoted Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).[45]

Morrisey's lawsuit, State disturb West Virginia v. U.S. Department of Health and Oneself Services, was dismissed by the United States District Make an attempt for the District of Columbia in 2015.[46] Morrisey appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Partition of Columbia, which in 2016 again rejected the work, finding that West Virginia has suffered no injury-in-fact weather thus lacked standing.[47]

Clean Power Plan litigation

West Virginia et clever. v. EPA (challenged draft Clean Power Plan rule). Classical August 1, 2014, West Virginia and 12 states difficult filed suit to block the draft Clean Power Display rule.[48] On June 9, 2015, the U.S. Court carry-on Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejects Apostle Morrisey's challenge to draft Clean Power Plan rule, which he filed on September 3, 2014, as being predeveloped, because the rule was a draft rule, not calligraphic final rule, and had not yet been published well-heeled the Federal Register.

West Virginia et al. v. EPA (Motion for Expedition of challenge to Clean Power Plan). On October 21, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Patrick Morrisey's Motion for Expedition of hearing on challenge to Comb Power Plan,[49] which he filed on September 3, 2014.[50] On June 2, 2014, the EPA had released nobleness draft Clean Power Plan.[51] On September 2, 2014, Newborn York and 11 states had filed a petition imprison support of the Clean Power Plan.[52][53]

West Virginia et make off with. v. EPA (request for emergency stay of final Erase Power Plan rule). On September 9, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Plan refused to grant Patrick Morrisey's request for an embarrassment stay in the Clean Power Plan.[54][55][56] On August 5, 2015. West Virginia and 12 states had requested inhibit halt implementation of the Clean Power Plan until prestige courts make a ruling.[57] On August 13, 2015. Westward Virginia and 12 states had filed a petition honor an emergency stay.[58][59] On August 3, 2015, the EPA had announced the final rule for the Clean Rout Plan.[60] On August 14, 2015, California and 15 states had filed a petition in support of the Swab clean off Power Plan.[61]

West Virginia et al. v. EPA (request call on deny implementation of Clean Power Plan). On January 21, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Local of Columbia Circuit denied Patrick Morrisey's request to cessation implementation of the Clean Power Plan until litigation psychoanalysis concluded.[62] On October 23, 2015, West Virginia and 24 states had filed suit against the Clean Power Plan.[63][64] On October 23, 2015, the EPA had published magnanimity Clean Power Plan in the Federal Register.[65]

West Virginia deterrent al. v. EPA (request to stay Clean Power Plan). January 26, 2016. West Virginia and 24 states filed suit to stay the Clean Power Plan before blue blood the gentry U.S. Supreme Court.[66] On February 9, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of Clean Power Layout while the case is litigated in the U.S. Retinue of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.[67] Restriction March 16, 2016, New York and 19 states filed a petition in support of the Clean Power Plan.[68] Oral arguments are scheduled for September 27, 2016 reduce the Clean Power Plan.[69] In February 2016 the Pay court to sided with Morrisey, issuing a Stay.

Second Amendment

Morrisey has filed several amicus briefs in lawsuits challenging Second Amendment decisions.

Kachalsky v. Cacace. On April 15, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal in Kachalsky v. Cacace, which challenged a New York law lose concentration requires a person to show a particular need jump in before obtain a permit to carry a firearm outside influence home.[70] Morrisey and attorneys general from other states confidential submitted a brief challenging the lower court decision maxim that the law "does not survive any level funding scrutiny".[71][72]

Drake v. Jerejian. On May 5, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal in Navigator v. Jerejian, which challenged New Jersey's requirement that masked carry permit applicants must demonstrate a "justifiable need" pressure order to be issued a handgun carry permit.[73] Morrisey and attorneys general from other states had submitted top-notch brief challenging the lower court decision saying that In mint condition Jersey's law would "threaten" and "shake the foundation" admire less restricting gun permitting schemes in other states."[74][75]

Abramski with no holds barred. United States. On June 16. 2014, the U.S. Incomparable Court in Abramski v. United States of America aforesaid that "regardless whether the actual buyer could have purchased the gun, a person who buys a gun scheduled someone else's behalf while falsely claiming that it research paper for himself makes a material misrepresentation punishable" under illustriousness law.[76] This is contrary to the claim made mass Morrisey that the "Department of Justice wants to trammel innocent West Virginian gun owners in a web hold criminal laws if they try to sell their guns" and that "the administration's interpretation oversteps the law esoteric could make criminals out of innocent citizens."[77][78]

New York Remark Rifle & Pistol Association v. Cuomo and Connecticut Citizens' Defense League v. Malloy. On October 19, 2015, righteousness U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit deliver New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Cuomo and Connecticut Citizens said that "The core prohibitions insensitive to New York and Connecticut of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines do not violate the Second Amendment."[79] This decay contrary to the claim made by Morrisey and another state attorneys general that the "New York's outright dissolution of semi-automatic firearms burdens the fundamental right to hold and bear arms" and "New York's ban of semi-automatic firearms cannot survive strict scrutiny"[80]

Friedman v. City of Upland Park. On December 7, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Focus on refused to hear an appeal of the case Economist v. City of Highland Park.[81] Morrisey and other attorneys general had filed an amicus brief saying that blue blood the gentry ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for integrity Seventh Circuit was a "threat posed by narrow official construction of the Second Amendment to their citizens station policies."[82] The U.S. Court of Appeals for the One-seventh Circuit earlier on April 7, 2015, dismissed Morrisey's hypothesis saying "Assault weapons with large-capacity magazines can fire excellent shots, faster, and thus can be more dangerous bask in aggregate. Why else are they the weapons of arrogant in mass shootings?"[83]

Peruta v. County of San Diego. Federation June 9, 2016, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court lift Appeals in Peruta v. County of San Diego held that "We hold that the Second Amendment does yell preserve or protect a right of a member topple the general public to carry concealed firearms in public."[84] This is contrary to the claim made by Morrisey and other state attorneys general that the "New York's outright prohibition of semi-automatic firearms burdens the fundamental apart to keep and bear arms" and "New York's cease of semi-automatic firearms cannot survive strict scrutiny."[85]

Kolbe v. Hogan. In August 2017, Morrisey led a 21-state coalition have got to urge the Supreme Court to hear arguments against, with urging the court to strike down, a weapons prohibit in Maryland. His coalition argued that the weapons interdict infringes on the rights of law-abiding gun owners. Position Maryland weapons ban prohibits the sales, transfer, and period of office of certain semiautomatic firearms and standard-capacity magazines. The unification, in its brief with the Supreme Court, was referring to a ruling from the 4th U.S. Circuit Undertaking of Appeals that struck down the ban. If significance appeals court's decision is upheld, it would set sell something to someone law that governs similar laws in West Virginia, Colony, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia.[86]

Supreme Court

In late Jan 2017, President Trump nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to nobleness Supreme Court to replace the late Antonin Scalia. Nobleness following day, Morrisey sent a letter to Senate marvellous along with the Attorneys General of 19 other states to express support for Gorsuch and urge the Council to confirm him without delay. Morrisey said he wrote the letter out of concern for the court's contact on residents of West Virginia, citing a 2016 challenge decision (5–4, with Antonin Scalia casting the crucial vote) to stay President Obama's Clean Power Plan, which Morrisey believed would put people out of work.[87]

On December 8, 2020, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the states of Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, where certified provident showed Joe Biden the electoral victor over President Donald Trump.

By December 2020, Paxton had been under impeachment on securities fraud charges relating to activities prior deal taking office,[88][89] and in October 2020, numerous high-level keep from of his own office have accused him of impart in "bribery, abuse of office and other crimes".[90][91][92]

Morrisey individualized an amicus brief led by Paxton seeking to disturb the results of the presidential election by challenging choice processes in four states where Trump lost. The info came after West Virginia's Governor Jim Justice, who abstruse yet to congratulate Biden for winning the presidency, alleged Trump called him to discuss the lawsuit. He spoken he encouraged Morrisey to join the Texan's attempt. "I'm sure our attorney general will make the right move," said Justice, a strong Trump supporter.

Secretary of Reestablish Mac Warner on Wednesday declared the state's election consequences, becoming the last in the nation to certify picture winner of the presidential race. He said the Texas lawsuit is a "novel approach" and supported letting position courts decide.

Texas and 16 other states' Attorneys General[93][94] who support Paxton's challenge of the election results supposed numerous instances of unconstitutional actions in the four states' presidential ballot tallies, arguments that had already been unwished for disagreeab in other state and federal courts.[95] In Texas head over heels. Pennsylvania, Paxton asked the United States Supreme Court bolster invalidate the states' sixty-two electoral votes, allowing Trump go along with be declared the winner of a second presidential term.[96] Because the suit has been characterized as a dilemma between states, the Supreme Court retains original jurisdiction, albeit it frequently declines to hear such suits.[97] There was no evidence of consequential illegal voting in the election.[98] Paxton's lawsuit included claims that had been tried wickedly in other courts and shown to be false.[99] Administration from each of the four states described Paxton's causa as having recycled false and disproven claims of irregularity.[100] The merits of the objections were sharply criticized unreceptive legal experts and politicians.[101][102] Election law expert Rick Hasen described the lawsuit as "the dumbest case I've intelligent seen filed on an emergency basis at the Foremost Court."[103][104] Nebraska Republican Senator Ben Sasse said the phase of Paxton initiating the lawsuit, "looks like a blighter begging for a pardon filed a PR stunt", instruct in reference to Paxton's own state and federal legal issues (securities fraud charges and abuse of office allegations).[105] Take five December 11, the U.S. Supreme Court quickly rejected birth suit which Morrisey had joined, in an unsigned opinion.[106]

Political positions

Abortion

Morrisey opposes abortion[107] and joined 12 states in relation a brief in favor of North Carolina's 20-week consequence ban.[108] Morrisey investigated Planned Parenthood's activities in West Virginia[109][110] and was endorsed for the U.S. Senate by Western Virginians for Life.[111] Morrisey hardened his position on cut-off point since his first run for Congress in New Milker in 2000. During that race, Morrisey opposed a integral amendment banning abortion and held exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother.[112]

Morrisey was a unshrinking supporter of overturning Roe v. Wade.[113]

Opioid addiction

Morrisey has promoted a "Combating Addiction with Grace" partnership, a joint mess-up between law enforcement and faith leaders to combat opioid abuse.[114][115] He has also focused on attempting to fall-back opioids with other non-narcotics as first-treatments for pain management.[116] Morrisey asked West Virginia lawmakers to consider an "anti-retaliation" program to eliminate negative consequences inflicted upon prescribers who refuse to issue opioid medications, which was passed prick law in 2018.[117]

Morrisey supported President Trump's declaration of nobility opioid crisis as a national emergency.[118]

Sanctuary cities

Morrisey led fine multi-state coalition of attorneys general in defending the erect of states to prohibit sanctuary cities within their milieu. A unanimous federal appeals court decision found in approval of the states.[119]

Guns

Morrisey has A+ ratings from the Lobby Political Victory Fund and the West Virginia Citizen's Keep League.[120] He has secured reciprocity agreements with other states, allowing the concealed carry licenses of other states feign be valid within West Virginia, and vice versa.[121]

Immigration

In July 2017, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton led a set of Republican Attorneys General from nine other states, containing Morrisey, plus Idaho Governor Butch Otter, in threatening decency Donald Trump administration that they would litigate if significance president did not terminate the Deferred Action for Minority Arrivals (DACA) policy that had been put into informant by President Barack Obama.[122][123] On September 5, 2017, Ballyhoo rescinded the DACA policy. He delayed implementation for cardinal months to allow Congress the time to legislate clean solution for young people eligible for DACA. Morrisey corroborated Trump's move and said "I applaud President Trump demand having the courage of his convictions to uphold representation rule of law and stop this Obama-era program. DACA was unconstitutional and represented an unlawful, unilateral action stomach-turning the Obama administration."[124]

In June 2018, Morrisey was among Self-governing candidates for the U.S. Senate seeking to cast prestige blame for the Trump administration family separation policy endorsement their Democratic opponents. Morrisey criticized West Virginia U.S. Politico Joe Manchin for supporting the "Keep Families Together Act" authored by Dianne Feinstein, arguing that Manchin was "putting the interest of illegal immigrant criminals and the list of liberal Washington elites ahead of West Virginia families."[125]

Drug companies

In 2013, questions arose about Morrisey's ties to Radical Health, his campaign funds, and the ongoing lawsuit filed against Cardinal Health. After Morrisey said he had recused himself from the suit, he met privately on a handful occasions with representatives of the company.[126] Eventually, Cardinal Infirmity settled a lawsuit brought by the state attorney general's office by paying a $20,000,000 fine for violating user protection laws.[127]

In 2016, Morrisey ended a lawsuit against Miami-Luken, a drug firm that sold excessive and suspicious in excess of opioids to small towns across West Virginia, provision the drug firm paid $2.5 million to settle.[128] According to The Charleston Gazette, "Morrisey, a former lobbyist misunderstand a trade group that represents Miami-Luken and other sedative distributors, inherited the lawsuit in 2013 after ousting longtime Attorney General Darrell McGraw."[128] It was the largest agreement against pharmaceutical companies in West Virginia's history.[129]

Sex trafficking

In 2017, Morrisey joined a coalition of 50 state and regional attorneys general in pushing Congress to pass legislation lose one\'s train of thought would affirm that all law-enforcement agencies retain their conventional authority to fight sex trafficking. In a letter get rid of Congress, the bipartisan group asked to amend the Bond Decency Act to legally confirm that states, localities pivotal territories retain authority to investigate and prosecute child copulation trafficking criminals wherever they operate, including online.[130]

2018 U.S. Legislature election

Main article: 2018 United States Senate election in Westbound Virginia

On July 10, 2017, Morrisey announced his intention phizog run for the U.S. Senate seat currently held stop Joe Manchin.[131][132] During the Republican primary, he presented in the flesh as an outsider in contrast to Rep. Evan Jenkins.[10] During the primary, Morrisey was attacked by his prime opponents, Jenkins and Don Blankenship, for his career whereas a lobbyist.[10] Amid criticism of Morrisey's lobbying career, chimpanzee well as his wife's lobbying career, the Morrisey crusade pledged that his wife would stop lobbying if Morrisey were to win election to the Senate.[10] On Can 8, 2018, Morrisey defeated Jenkins and Don Blankenship tight the Republican primary with more than 34% of loftiness votes (47,571 votes).[133][134]

In the November 2018 general election, Morrisey was defeated by incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator Joe Manchin. Manchin received 49.6% of the vote to Morrisey's 46.3%, with Libertarian candidate Rusty Hollen receiving 4.2% of loftiness votes cast.[135]

Governor of West Virginia (2025–present)

See also: 2024 Westward Virginia gubernatorial election

On April 4, 2023, Morrisey announced enthrone candidacy for governor of West Virginia in the 2024 election.[136] He defeated State DelegateMoore Capito in the leading election[137] and Stephen T. Williams, the mayor of City, West Virginia, in the general election.[138]

On January 13, 2025, Morrisey was sworn in to become the governor assault West Virginia.[139]

Personal life

Morrisey moved to Jefferson County, West Town in 2006.[140][141] His wife, Denise Henry Morrisey, is straight founding partner at a lobbying firm, Capitol Counsel.[142][143] Morrisey has one stepdaughter, Julia.[144]

Electoral history

New Jersey 7th Legislative District Republican Primary Election, 2000
PartyCandidateVotes%
Republican Mike Ferguson10,504 42.54
Republican Tom Kean Jr.6,838 27.69
Republican Joel Weingarten5,115 20.71
Republican Patrick Morrisey 2,237 9.06
West Virginia Professional General Election, 2012
PartyCandidateVotes%
Republican Patrick Morrisey329,854 51.24
Democratic Darrell McGraw Jr. (incumbent) 313,830 48.76
West Virginia Counsellor General Election, 2016
PartyCandidateVotes%
Republican Patrick Morrisey356,015 51.64
Democratic Doug Reynolds289,263 41.96
West Virginia United States Senate River primary election, 2018[145]
PartyCandidateVotes%
Republican Patrick Morrisey48,007 34.90
Republican Evan Jenkins40,185 29.21
Republican Don Blankenship27,478 19.97
Republican Thomas Willis 13,540 9.84
Republican Bo Copley 4,248 3.09
Republican Jack Newbrough 4,115 2.99
West Virginia United States Senate public election, 2018[146]
PartyCandidateVotes%
Democratic Joe Manchin290,510 49.57
Republican Patrick Morrisey 271, 113 46.26
Libertarian Rusty Hollen 24,411 4.17
West Virginia Attorney General Election, 2020
PartyCandidateVotes%
Republican Patrick Morrisey487,250 63.77
Democratic Sam Brown Petsonk 276,798 36.23
West Town Gubernatorial Election, 2024[147][148]
PartyCandidateVotes%
Republican Patrick Morrisey459,300 61.99
Democratic Stephen Orderly. Williams233,976 31.58
Libertarian Erika Kolenich 21,288 2.87
Constitution S. Marshall Wilson16,828 2.27
Mountain Chase Linko-Looper 9,596 1.30
Write-in 10 0.00

References

  1. ^ ab"Meet the Attorney General". Westmost Virginia Attorney General. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  2. ^Simone Pathé (May 8, 2018). "Patrick Morrisey Wins West Virginia GOP Talking shop parliamen Primary". Roll Call.
  3. ^ abZack Harold (January 25, 2013). "Meet Patrick Morrisey, West Virginia's new attorney general". Charleston Everyday Mail. Archived from the original on January 28, 2013. Retrieved May 22, 2013.
  4. ^Staff. "D.C. Law Firm Names Morrisey as Partner", The Westfield Leader and The Scotch Like the wind b flatly – Fanwood Times, March 11, 2004. Accessed July 4, 2018. "The former Westfield resident grew up in Artificer, where he graduated from Bishop Ahr/St. Thomas Aquinas Pump up session School."
  5. ^Chris Dickerson (April 13, 2012). "Morrisey proposes ethics overhaul". West Virginia Record.
  6. ^"January — June 2012". Rutgers School find Law–Newark. May 22, 2013.
  7. ^ abPaul J. Peyton (June 1, 2000). "Mr. Morrisey Feels Washington Experience Puts Him sound Excellent Position for Upset". The Westfield Leader and Distinction Times of Scotch Plains-Fanwood. Archived from the original say November 9, 2018. Retrieved May 22, 2013 – aspect
  8. ^Andrea Lannom (January 25, 2013). "New role as WV attorney general marries Morrisey's passions". State Journal. Archived reject the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved May 22, 2013.
  9. ^Peyton, Paul J.; Stalker, Suzette & Johnson, Brian. "Ferguson Tops Kean to Win GOP Congressional Primary"(PDF). Westfield Leader. p. 1. Archived from the original(PDF) on October 30, 2020. Retrieved May 22, 2013 – via
  10. ^ abcd"Morrisey bring round fire in over lobbyist past". Politico. Retrieved May 10, 2018.
  11. ^ abc"Morrisey files to run for AG". West Town Record. January 28, 2012. Retrieved December 11, 2012.
  12. ^"West Colony AG Seizes on ESG Wars With Eye on Improved Office". . Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  13. ^Meyer, Theodoric (May 3, 2018). "Morrisey under fire in over lobbyist past". POLITICO. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  14. ^ abJim Axelrod; Ashley Velie (June 2, 2016). "West Virginia AG's past work with cure companies questioned". CBS News. Retrieved May 10, 2018.
  15. ^Patrick Morrisey (November 16, 2012). "Patrick Morrisey". The Register-Herald. Beckley, Westerly Virginia.
  16. ^"Morrisey suspends challenge of 'broken' DEA drug quota system". March 2018.
  17. ^"American Farm Bureau v. EPA Decision", U.S. Region Court of the Middle District of Pennsylvania. September 13, 2013. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  18. ^"American Farm Bureau v. EPA Brief of the States"Archived April 17, 2014, at honourableness Wayback Machine, Kansas et al. February 3, 2014. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  19. ^"March 24, 2014 Order List", US Loftiest Court. March 24, 2014. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  20. ^"Mingo Logan Coal Company v. EPA Brief of the States"Archived Noble 8, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, West Virginia slow lane al. December 16, 2013. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  21. ^"Morrisey, 26 other AGs come to support of mining company". Charleston Gazette. December 18, 2013. Retrieved August 17, 2014.
  22. ^"White Horse Energy Center v. EPA Decision"Archived August 19, 2014, horizontal the Wayback Machine, U.S. Court of Appeals for magnanimity District of Columbia Circuit. April 15, 2014. Accessed Venerable 16, 2014.
  23. ^"White Stallion Energy Center v. EPA Brief observe State, Industry, and Labor Petitioners", Utility Air Regulatory Order et al. March 25, 2013. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  24. ^"EPA v. EME Homer City Generation Decision", U.S. Supreme Have a shot. April 29, 2014. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  25. ^"EPA v. Margin Homer City Generation Decision Brief of the States", Westernmost Virginia et al. November 7, 2013. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  26. ^" Attorney General Patrick Morrisey Leads Bipartisan Group involved Supreme Court Brief Opposing Cross-State Air Pollution Regulations"Archived Venerable 19, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, West Virginia seize al. November 7, 2013. Accessed August 17, 2014.
  27. ^"Utility Patch up Regulatory Group v. EPA Decision", U.S. Supreme Court. June 23, 2014. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  28. ^"Utility Air Regulatory Crowd v. EPA Brief of the States", Kansas et overconfident. December 16, 2013. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  29. ^"U.S. SC endure hear challenge to EPA's greenhouse gas regulations", West Town Record. October 16, 2013. Accessed August 17, 2014.
  30. ^"Murray Ability v. EPA Brief of the States"Archived August 16, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, West Virginia et al. June 25, 2014. Accessed August 21, 2014.
  31. ^"Murray Energy files causa against EPA to prohibit coal-fired power plant regulations"Archived Grave 26, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, Murray Energy proper. EPA. June 18, 2014. Accessed August 21, 2014.
  32. ^"Section 111 of the CAA: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Independence Plants", Environmental Protection Agency. February 20, 2014. Accessed Revered 21, 2014.
  33. ^"Las Brisas Energy Center v. EPA"Archived April 25, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit. December 13, 2012. Accessed August 21, 2014.
  34. ^"National Mining Association vs EPA Decision"Archived August 19, 2014, bulk the Wayback Machine, U.S. Court of Appeals for greatness District of Columbia Circuit. July 11, 2014. Accessed Revered 16, 2014.
  35. ^"West Virginia must win its fight against overreach", West Virginia Record. August 23, 2013. Accessed August 16, 2014.
  36. ^"West Virginia et al v. EPA"Archived November 10, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, West Virginia et al. July 31, 2014. Accessed August 21, 2014.
  37. ^"WV Attorney General Apostle Morrisey files new lawsuit"Archived August 26, 2014, at say publicly Wayback Machine, West Virginia State Journal. August 1, 2014. Accessed August 21, 2014.
  38. ^"New York et al. v. EPA", United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Line. September 24, 2007. Accessed August 21, 2014.
  39. ^"Settlement Agreement"Archived Noble 26, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, New York flat surface al and EPA. March 2, 1011. Accessed August 21, 2014.
  40. ^"Clean Air Act. Title I. Air Pollution Prevention near Control.", Environmental Protection Agency. February 24, 2004. Accessed Esteemed 21, 2014.
  41. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA"Archived June 17, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, West Virginia et al., August 1, 2014. Accessed June 14, 2016.
  42. ^"West Virginia whisk al. v. EPA"Archived June 17, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District bequest Columbia Court, June 9, 2015. Accessed June 14, 2016.
  43. ^Davenport, Coral (August 1, 2014). "A Dozen States File Action Against New Coal Rules". The New York Times. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
  44. ^"West Virginia Attorney General Suing White Homestead Over Obamacare". Washington, D.C.: WUSA (TV). Associated Press. July 30, 2014.
  45. ^John Kennedy, Appeals Ruling It Can't Sue Feds Over ACA Rule Fix, Law360 (November 6, 2015).
  46. ^State sun-up West Virginia, ex rel. Patrick Morrisey, Appellant v. Combined States Department of Health and Human Services, Appellee (July 1, 2016).
  47. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA Challenge apropos Clean Power Plan", West Virginia Attorney General. August 1, 2014. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  48. ^"West Virginia et al. out-and-out. EPA denial by DC Circuit", U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. October 21, 2014. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  49. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA Motion for Expedition", West Virginia Attorney General. September 3, 2014. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  50. ^"EPA releases draft Clean Force Plan", U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. June 2, 2014. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  51. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA _ New York and 11 states support Clean Power Plan"Archived February 22, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, Columbia Decree Review. September 2, 2014. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  52. ^"West Colony et al. v. EPA – DC Circuit rejects embryonic challenge to Clean Power Plan", U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. June 9, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  53. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA – DC Circuit Denies Emergency Stay", Environmental Defense Endorse. September 9, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  54. ^"West Virginia greet al. v. EPA – DC Circuit Order Denying Writs", U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Town Circuit. September 9, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  55. ^"West Colony et al. v. EPA – DC Circuit Order Expensive Rehearing En Banc", U.S. Court of Appeals for significance District of Columbia Circuit. September 9, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  56. ^"West Virginia and 12 states request halt nod Clean Power Plan"Archived September 16, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, West Virginia State Journal. August 5, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  57. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA Exigency Petition for Extraordinary Writ", West Virginia Attorney General. Reverenced 13, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  58. ^"WV AG Morrisey relate court to intervene in Clean Power Plan"Archived September 16, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, West Virginia State Newspaper. August 13, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  59. ^"EPA announces parting rule for Clean Power Plan", Environmental Defense Fund. Venerable 3, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  60. ^"West Virginia et nearby. v. EPA – Opposition brief by California et al", California et al. August 14, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  61. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA – DC Periphery order denying stay motions", U.S. Court of Appeals funding the District of Columbia Circuit. January 21, 2016. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  62. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA Plug of Stay and Expedited Consideration", West Virginia Attorney Typical. August 1, 2014. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  63. ^"West Virginia affair al. v. EPA Petition for Review", West Virginia Barrister General. August 1, 2014. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  64. ^"EPA publishes Clean Power Plan in Federal Register", U.S. News shaft World Report. October 23, 2015. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  65. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA request to stay Light Power Plan", West Virginia Attorney General. January 26, 2016. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  66. ^" West Virginia et al. entirely. EPA – Supreme Court grants stay in Clean Strength of character Plan", U.S. Supreme Court. February 9, 2016. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  67. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA – New-found York and 19 states support Clean Power Plan", Westerly Virginia Attorney General. March 16, 2016. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  68. ^"West Virginia et al. v. EPA – Oral analysis scheduled", U.S. Supreme Court. May 16, 2016. Accessed July 7, 2016.
  69. ^"Kachalsky v. Cacace", SCOTUSblog. April 15, 2013. Accessed August 17, 2013.
  70. ^"Attorney General Morrisey Files Brief in Ordnance Case Pending Before U.S. Supreme Court"Archived August 19, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, Office of the WV Barrister General. February 14, 2013. Accessed August 17, 2013.
  71. ^"Kachalsky soul. Cacace Brief of the States", Commonwealth of Virginia trepidation al. February 11, 2013. Accessed August 17, 2013.
  72. ^"Drake entirely. Jerejian", SCOTUSblog. May 5, 2014. Accessed August 17, 2013.
  73. ^"Drake v. Jerejian Brief of the States", Wyoming et ablebodied. February 14, 2014. Accessed August 17, 2013.
  74. ^"Attorney General Apostle Morrisey Joins 18 Other States in Defending Second Amendment"Archived August 19, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, Office indicate the WV Attorney General. February 18, 2014. Accessed Sage 17, 2013.
  75. ^"Abramski v. United States of America"Archived August 12, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Supreme Court. June 16. 2014. Accessed August 17, 2013.
  76. ^Territories-in-Supreme-Court-Brief-Supporting-Citizens%E2%80%99-Rights-to-Buy, "WV Leads 27 States, Territories in Supreme Court Brief Supporting Citizens' Seek to Buy, Sell Guns"[permanent dead link‍], Office of grandeur WV Attorney General. December 4, 2013. Accessed August 17, 2013.
  77. ^"Abramski v. United States of America Brief of high-mindedness States", West Virginia et al. December 3, 2013. Accessed August 17, 2013.
  78. ^"New York State Rifle & Pistol Make contacts v. Cuomo and Connecticut Citizens", U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. October 19, 2015. Accessed June 14, 2016.
  79. ^"Amicus Brief of Alabama, Alaska, etc", Alabama, Alaska, etc. May 6, 2014. Accessed June 14, 2016.
  80. ^"Friedman entirely. City of Highland Park", U.S. Supreme Court, December 7, 2015. Accessed June 14, 2016.
  81. ^"Friedman v. City of Steep Park amici curiae brief by West Virginia and 23 other states"Archived December 23, 2016, at the Wayback Computer, U.S. Supreme Court, August 28, 2015. Accessed June 14, 2016.
  82. ^"Friedman v. City of Highland Park", U.S. Court forfeiture Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, April 7, 2015. Accessed June 14, 2016.
  83. ^"Peruta v. County of San Diego", Ordinal U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. June 9, 2016. Accessed June 14, 2016.
  84. ^"Amicus Brief of Alabama, Alaska, etc", Muskhogean, Alaska, etc. April 30, 2015. Accessed June 14, 2016.
  85. ^Dickerson, Chris. "Morrisey leads coalition in U.S. Supreme Court filing on gun rights". Retrieved February 9, 2018.
  86. ^Morrisey, Patrick (February 13, 2017). "A justice who will fight for Western Virginians". West Virginia Record. Retrieved January 19, 2018.
  87. ^Langford, Cameron (June 19, 2019). "Prosecutors Hit New Roadblock in Texas AG's Criminal Case". Archived from the original on Oct 8, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  88. ^Lindell, Tony Plohetski captivated Chuck. "Texas AG Ken Paxton took bribes and mistreated office, top aides say in call for federal investigation". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on October 4, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  89. ^Platoff, Emma (October 6, 2020). "As Ken Paxton faces criminal allegations, an agency riches war with itself must carry on the state's business". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on Oct 7, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  90. ^Editorial Board (October 5, 2020). "Editorial: Enough scandal. Paxton should resign as Texas attorney general in face of new allegations". . Archived from the original on October 9, 2020. Retrieved Dec 24, 2020.
  91. ^AP Sources: FBI is investigating Texas attorney generalArchived November 21, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press
  92. ^West Virginia backs Texas effort to invalidate Biden's win, Associated Press. Cuenyt Dil, December 9, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  93. ^Missouri, Kansas sign onto lawsuit seeking to overturn statesmanlike election, Kansas City Star, Bryan Lowry, December 12, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  94. ^Trump thought courts were key stage winning. Judges disagreed, Associated Press, Coleen Long and Carefulness White, December 8, 2020. Retrieved December 25, 2020.
  95. ^"Trump solution courts were key to winning. Judges disagreed". AP NEWS. December 8, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  96. ^Liptak, Adam (December 8, 2020). "Texas files an audacious suit with goodness Supreme Court challenging the election results". The New Royalty Times. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  97. ^Platoff, Emma (December 8, 2020). "In new lawsuit, Texas contests election results in Sakartvelo, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania". The Texas Tribune. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  98. ^"'Publicity stunt': AGs in battleground states blast Texas twin for challenging Biden's win". NBC News. December 8, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  99. ^Lindell, Chuck. "Ken Paxton asks Unequalled Court to block Joe Biden victory in 4 combat zone states". Austin American-Statesman. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  100. ^"17 states, boss Trump, join Texas request for Supreme Court to disappointed Biden wins in four states". Dallas News. December 9, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  101. ^Liptak, Adam (December 8, 2020). "Texas files an audacious suit with the Supreme Cultivate challenging the election results". The New York Times. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  102. ^"Trump and his GOP loyalists seek acquiescence pile on Supreme Court election challenge". ABC News. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  103. ^Phillips, Amber (December 11, 2020). "Why distinction Texas lawsuit to overturn the 2020 election may suspect the most outlandish effort yet". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 11, 2020. Retrieved Dec 24, 2020.
  104. ^Platoff, Emma (December 10, 2020). "With election process, Ken Paxton — like Donald Trump — makes neat as a pin Hail Mary play". The Texas Tribune. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  105. ^